Mortality Atlas of Cancer and Other Causes.
Spain 1975-1986.


Guide for reading and interpreting maps and graphs

With  the intention of aiding the reader to draw  his/her  own conclusions  from  the  various maps, graphs and  tables,  a  few general  pointers for interpretation purposes have been  set  out below.
1. Dettection  of  the existence of  geographical  patterns

  This amounts to attempting to answer the question: "Could chance alone explain  the distribution of mortality due to any  given  cause?" The  first step is to examine Rates Map . These maps are  artificially  colour-compensated. There will always be three provinces in those shades  that denote scale extremes.

One has to try  and  perceive whether  there  is a discernable gradient in the shading  of  the   scale  colours, i.e., whether there is a rise in  mortality  from   north to south, the interior to the coast or vice versa. Examples of such gradients are :  as well as many other (non-cancer)  causes  of death  which  exhibit a marked and  defined  north-south  pattern   (cardiovascular  diseases in general and COPD).

All these  causes quoted here by way of example present statistically significant D cluster-indices . In other words, chance alone cannot explain such geographical  distribution  or,  put another way,  there  may  be environmental  causes  at play which could possibly  account  for   this  distribution. Similar distribution patterns can in  general be  construed  as  diseases with  similar  causes.  The  clearest example of this is provided by tumours associated with the  habit of  smoking :

which display a pattern similar to  and  coinciding  with that evinced by cardiovascular diseases.

2. Distinguishing causes of death having environmental components   from those having genetic components

Diseases with a  pronounced  environmental  component  in their etiology  will  present  rates having a relatively wider range (i.e., difference between highestand  lowest  rates).  In  order to check  for  this,  observe the   histogram  featuring the rankings of the adjusted rates  and  the range.  A useful exercise might be to calculate a  ratio  between the highest and lowest rates. For instance, cancer of the  buccal cavity  and  pharynx in males yields a rate ratio of  4:1  (Cadiz   10:6, Avila 2:6). As it happens however, this ratio  -regardless of  which malignant tumour is being studied- always  exceeds  2, and  there  is  the  possibility of  outliers  (e.g.,  Ceuta  and Melilla). Of greater use then is to determine whether the set  of provinces  lying close to the Spanish average (provinces  at  the intermediate level) is very numerous or, what amounts to the same thing,  whether  the  highest  peak  in  the  smoothed  histogram coincides  with or approaches the average.

3. Gender-related differences in mortality

Ranked histograms for males  and females are drawn to the same scale, that is  to  say, the  Y axes are the same length. This enables comparison  of  the "thickness"   of   the  histograms,  thereby   highlighting   the differences.  All tumours associated with the habit of  cigarette smoking (e.g., buccal cavity and pharynx , esophagus , larynx ,  and lung ) and consumption of alcoholic drinks (larynx and  esophagus) exhibit considerable differences as between the sexes.

4. Time trends

Predominance of one of the two shades used in the third map (time trend) indicates -in addition to intensity- the precise direction of trend in Spain.

For example, stomach  cancer shows a predominance of blue (decline) in all provinces, with the possibility of some provinces being pinpointed where the fall-off is  slightly  smaller.  Comparisons should be  run  between  maps plotting  male and those plotting female trends, since there  are divergent  gender-related  patterns  for  some  important  causes associated  with  cigarette smoking, such as lung  cancer,  where observation  of females reveals which provinces are undergoing  a shift  in direction of trend.

5. Competitive  causes

 One of the reasons for  including  other causes  of  mortality in this study was to check  their  role  as   competitive  causes  for  cancer  insofar  as  distribution   was concerned.  An example of this is the marked north-south  pattern   for  all  cardiovascular  diseases, which  might  conceivably  be concealing  the pattern for frequent malignant tumours,  such  as those  found in cancer of the lung and esophagus. However,  those provinces  with  the highest mortality rates  for  cardiovascular diseases also have the highest rates for cancer.


Contents | Introduction| Results| Coments | References |